<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalism as an Encounter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therowboat.com/2009/08/journalism-as-an-encounter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therowboat.com/2009/08/journalism-as-an-encounter/</link>
	<description>Writings and rehearsals by Nathan Schneider.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:31:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.therowboat.com/2009/08/journalism-as-an-encounter/comment-page-1/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therowboat.com/?p=1170#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, description vs. explanation.  I should break out the trusty Wayne Proudfoot.  Anyway, I&#039;m gearing up to write profiles of our lead plaintiffs - some rather marginalized people.  I&#039;d like to be their megaphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, description vs. explanation.  I should break out the trusty Wayne Proudfoot.  Anyway, I&#8217;m gearing up to write profiles of our lead plaintiffs &#8211; some rather marginalized people.  I&#8217;d like to be their megaphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.therowboat.com/2009/08/journalism-as-an-encounter/comment-page-1/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therowboat.com/?p=1170#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>But do you really think it would be ethical for you to continue the conversation offline? Wouldn&#039;t that compromise your integrity? ;)

When people question whether &quot;objectivity&quot; is a worthy goal, they often argue that it&#039;s a vanishing horizon -- we can&#039;t get &quot;objectivity,&quot; so why try? I agree with this argument, but I think Courtney&#039;s strategy is more salient: she points out ways in which, because all perspectives are already contingent on so many pre-existing factors, a voice that pretends to be ahistorical can actually be less truthful, less &quot;objective,&quot; than a collaborative voice. In other words, nice article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But do you really think it would be ethical for you to continue the conversation offline? Wouldn&#8217;t that compromise your integrity? <img src='http://www.therowboat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When people question whether &#8220;objectivity&#8221; is a worthy goal, they often argue that it&#8217;s a vanishing horizon &#8212; we can&#8217;t get &#8220;objectivity,&#8221; so why try? I agree with this argument, but I think Courtney&#8217;s strategy is more salient: she points out ways in which, because all perspectives are already contingent on so many pre-existing factors, a voice that pretends to be ahistorical can actually be less truthful, less &#8220;objective,&#8221; than a collaborative voice. In other words, nice article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.therowboat.com/2009/08/journalism-as-an-encounter/comment-page-1/#comment-6543</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therowboat.com/?p=1170#comment-6543</guid>
		<description>Wow Nathan, thank you so much for this thoughtful response to my piece. I wish it could be published side by side with the original column, as it expands on so much of what I touched on, deepens it, and problematizes it in a way that I think is really important (so meta here, huh?). 
I love this idea of journalism as an encounter. The danger of devolving into public relations is a big one, and that&#039;s why I was really clear with my subjects--from the beginning--that I intended to write compassionately critical pieces of them. Sometimes that was easy--my subjects had a strong sense of self, and had even come up with the critiques I was making of themselves. Somethings it was thornier. One subject and I decided not to move forward on publishing her profile because we couldn&#039;t find common ground. 
Anyway, would love to continue the conversation on and off line. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Nathan, thank you so much for this thoughtful response to my piece. I wish it could be published side by side with the original column, as it expands on so much of what I touched on, deepens it, and problematizes it in a way that I think is really important (so meta here, huh?).<br />
I love this idea of journalism as an encounter. The danger of devolving into public relations is a big one, and that&#8217;s why I was really clear with my subjects&#8211;from the beginning&#8211;that I intended to write compassionately critical pieces of them. Sometimes that was easy&#8211;my subjects had a strong sense of self, and had even come up with the critiques I was making of themselves. Somethings it was thornier. One subject and I decided not to move forward on publishing her profile because we couldn&#8217;t find common ground.<br />
Anyway, would love to continue the conversation on and off line. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

