Home
About
Archives
Articles


This page is an archive from the previous version of The Row Boat, which is why it doesn't look and work the same as the current version. However, these archives are fully functional and integrated with the new system.



Why does this site permit advertising?
Click here to discuss.



Creative Commons License

Powered by Little Logger





The Row Boat

"Had we but world enough, and time..." *






Celebrity Lostness

1/14/2007 21:00:31

I'm about the last person on the internet to come across this, but the other day a friend pointed out to me this home video on YouTube of Britney Spears talking to Kevin Federline. People say that she is obviously stoned on something and then they laugh and say how sad the whole thing is and so on, and this is all probably true. I guess I should begin by apologizing to her by joining the crowd hawking this thing around. But in the United States, celebrity lives are to an extent legally public property, which extends to a larger meaning: too late, the video has entered a shared identity. Talking about it is talking about ourselves, like so much else, like People magazine and its spawn.

The overwhelming sense I get from the video, as I attempt to make words out of it, is that Britney Spears is Lost. She (a worldwide sexual icon) begins by saying, whining, "I'm ugly." In a dark room with only one source of light and the shadow from a baseball cap covering her face, she burps loudly and seems to hit things (and nothing) with no provocation. "I feel like I've been missing out on life," she says, seriously, as if words are finally possible. She wants to travel in time, and is sure it is possible because she feels so damn behind, not living the way other people are. The video is rock bottom, so far as we can see. And all along there is the sneaking knowledge that we (the people) got here there, together with herself, through the covenant of celebrity that connects us.

("Celebrities are very Special people and have a very distinct line of dissemination. They have comm[unication] lines that others do not have and many medias[sic] to get their dissemination through" - L. Ron Hubbard (Flag Order 3323, 9 May 1973))

Lostness is a familiar theologian category, particularly in the American context. It is the opposite of the evangelical "saved" experience, taken for granted as a black-and-white question of the human condition. Lostness has its necessary place on the path to foundness, but it is self-evidently bad. Whether in the evangelical story, or the self-help story, or the newfound freethinking story, or whichever, people take their own meanings from the lines in Amazing Grace, "I once was lost, but now am found, was blind but now I see." The story, and its accompanying knowledge of lostness, carries wide currency.

It can be argued that other contexts emphasize this less. European (particularly Catholic) Christianity, is more touched by the community experience than the conversion experience. The medieval church offered many examples of suffering within salvation, such as Julian of Norwich and St. John of the Cross. What they endured was not quite lostness, for they held to their faith, but it would appear to many Americans perhaps too dangerously close for comfort. But seeing Britney Spears like this, and probably so many of the celebrities we idolize in moments we don't see, may suggest that normalcy is closer to lostness than we like.

How do I know if I am lost? I guess for the moment I leave this as a theological open question.




re:Celebrity Lostness - 1/15/2007 14:29:35
Posted by BT

B. Spears, 2003:

"Honestly, I think we should just trust our President in every decision that he makes and we should just support that, you know, and be faithful in what happens."

*

G. Debord, 1967:

"...Media stars are spectacular representations of living human beings, distilling the essence of the spectacle's banality into images of possible roles. Stardom is a diversification in the semblance of life — the object of an identification with mere appearance which is intended to compensate for the crumbling of directly experienced diversifications of productive activity. . . . Themselves incarnations of the inaccessible results of social labor, [celebrities] mimic by-products of that labor, and project these above labor so that they appear as its goal. The by-products in question are *power* and *leisure* — the power to decide and the leisure to consume which are the alpha and the omega of a process that is never questioned. . . . / The individual who in the service of the spectacle is placed in stardom's spotlight is in fact the opposite of an individual, and as clearly the enemy of the individual in himself as of the individual in others. In entering the spectacle as a model to be identified with, he renounces all autonomy in order himself to identify with the general law of obedience to the course of things. . . . The admirable people who personify the system are indeed well known for not being what they seem to be; they have achieved greatness by embracing a level of reality lower than that of the most insignificant individual life — and everyone knows it."




re:Celebrity Lostness - 2/14/2007 07:51:31
Posted by Barbara Kay Croissant

vesa hanatah svatma darsanam
isa darsanam swatma rupatah

When the creature abandons its illusory individual form and recognises itseslf as without attributes, it sees the Creator as its own true Self.

The solution to the ignorance and weakness of the individual is here revealed. It lies in the elimination of attributes (vesa), by recognising that one is truly not the body or the mind which are the vehicles of limitation. Such rcognition is possible only after the ego is dead and one has surrendered himself to the Creator. Then both are known to be the same attributeless Reality or Self.

Ironically, our efforts to improve our own image and achieve fame and wealth and power serve actually to increase our limitations.

Sri Maharshi's Way: A Translation and Commentary on Upadesa Saram by D.M. Sastri





Printer-friendly version


Name:

Email:

Subject:

Type in your comments below. Visit the styleguide for a list of suggested HTML tags.

Prove you are not a machine!
Please enter the 4-digit year that this post was originally submitted, which is given at the top of this page directly under the title and next to the date (e.g. 2005 in 9/18/2005 44:33:22)

Creative Commons License
The Row Boat basks under a liberating Creative Commons license